一个以建筑业的方式看待工会的主要行业。在21世纪，与建筑承包商签订的工会协议常常被视为低效和无效的。这意味着在工业建设中生产的损害主要可以通过项目劳动协议看到。项目劳工协议由项目业主和施工工会签订。在协议中，工会规定了该项目的小时工资和福利。这并不妨碍非联合承包商对该项目进行投标；但是，它对谈判范围内与该项目有关的大部分费用实行标准。这一举措通过调节与项目相关的多方面成本，有效降低建设项目投标的数量和质量，极大地限制了行业的经济增长。工会有许多可能的替代品，需要代理费，但这些替代品往往受到工会存在的限制，而工会是一个可以普遍存在的行业。工会的另一个选择是建立一个民主的工人组织。这些组织基本上完成了与工会相同的职能，但它们不强迫其行业中没有参与的同事支付任何代理费。尽管他们仍然参加集体谈判，但这是一种民主的办法，使每个成员的意见都能得到平等的听取。这使得个人有更大的发言权，并增加了谈判条件的灵活性。可以谈判的条款增加，是因为没有必要避免许多工会对诸如节育等问题持有严格意见的敏感话题。代理费是工会的一个致命的方面，工会的起源本来就很复杂，而且可能是非法的。这些费用被收取并不当地应用于所收取的经济中，然后以一种只限制经济的方式间接使用。它们不是唯一的选择，不应被视为唯一的选择。
澳洲建筑学作业代写 项目劳工协议
One major industry that sees unions in such a way as that of construction. Union agreements with construction contractors are often viewed as being inefficient and ineffective in the 21st century. The detriment that means produce within the industry construction can be seen primarily through project labour agreements. The project labour agreements are made between the owners of the project and the construction unions. Within the agreements, the union set the hourly wages and benefits for the project. It does not prevent nonunion contractors from bidding on the project; however, it does standard for the majority of the costs associated with the project that is within the negotiation. This action greatly limits the economic growth of the industry by regulating many aspects of costs associated with a project, effectively decreasing the quantity and quality of bids for construction projects. There many possible alternatives to unions, which require agency fees, that are often limited by the existence of the unions an industry in which they could be prevalent. One alternative to unions is a democratic worker organization. These organizations essentially complete the same function as a union, yet they do not force any agency fees onto the nonparticipating fellow employees of their industries. Though they still partake in collective bargaining, it is a democratic approach which allows for the opinion of each member to be heard equally. This allows for greater say of an individual and for increased flexibility in what terms may be negotiated. The increase in terms that can be negotiated derives from the lack of a need to avoid sensitive topics that many unions hold strict opinions on, such as birth control. Agency fees are a crippling aspect of unions that in origin are inherently complex and possibly illegal. These fees are collected and improperly applied into the economy from which they are taken and then used indirectly in a method that only limits the economy. They are not the only option and should not be treated as such.
本段内容来自网络 并不是我们的写手作品 请勿直接剽窃，查重100%，造成后果与本站无关。如需定制论文请记得联系我们。